Comments on: Digg Needs A Linkjacked Bury Option http://indexedcontent.com/smo/digg-needs-a-linkjacked-bury-option/ SEO Services & Link Building Tue, 02 Jun 2009 23:22:19 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3 hourly 1 By: Ryan http://indexedcontent.com/smo/digg-needs-a-linkjacked-bury-option/comment-page-1/#comment-60 Ryan Fri, 08 Feb 2008 03:04:36 +0000 http://indexedcontent.com/?p=12#comment-60 Hey I'm all about getting traffic and links from good content. I just don't think this is quality content. Hey I’m all about getting traffic and links from good content. I just don’t think this is quality content.

]]> By: Mark http://indexedcontent.com/smo/digg-needs-a-linkjacked-bury-option/comment-page-1/#comment-44 Mark Wed, 30 Jan 2008 23:11:18 +0000 http://indexedcontent.com/?p=12#comment-44 While I agree with your Linkjacked suggestion... As it would be very handy for burying blogspam. But, Can you really blame CrooksAndLiars for doing what they can to pull in traffic to their site? Whether they quoted other content or not, they still marketed it the right way and had a successful linkbait campaign. The content may not be fresh & new, but to most of the people who dugg it (and bothered to read the article) went to that site, accomplishing CrooksAndLiars goal. More Traffic & Links! For that, I cannot place blame. It's all part of the game... While I agree with your Linkjacked suggestion… As it would be very handy for burying blogspam.

But, Can you really blame CrooksAndLiars for doing what they can to pull in traffic to their site? Whether they quoted other content or not, they still marketed it the right way and had a successful linkbait campaign. The content may not be fresh & new, but to most of the people who dugg it (and bothered to read the article) went to that site, accomplishing CrooksAndLiars goal. More Traffic & Links!

For that, I cannot place blame. It’s all part of the game…

]]>